As a senior brand leader, I have to confess a frustration when I knew the details better than my Brand Manager. And it’s not just that senior leaders micro manage, it’s really that they can just analyze situations faster. They taught themselves the fundamentals of analysis. And they know when a Brand Manager hasn’t done the deep dive thinking. Opinions are great. Every brand leader should have one and be able to articulate their views. But it’s best when you can layer it in fact. One good rule for communicating your opinion is something I learned in my first year Logic class: Premise, Premise, Conclusion. Try it out, next time you’re engaged in debate. Just make sure the premise is backed by fact.
How to go Deeper
The best way go deep on your analysis, ask “so what does that mean” at least five times and watch the information gets richer and deeper.
Looking at the Gray’s Cookie example above, intuitively, it makes sense that going after Health Food Stores could be one option put on the table. But to say you need to be better, without digging in remains an unsubstantiated opinion. As you dig deeper, you see that going after Health Food stores, who are highly independent is labor intensive and the payback is just not there. Yes, you’re way under-developed. But it’s more expensive than other options. When you bring the option of going after mass into the mix, which is head office driven, you start to see a higher return on the investment. This is just a fictional example, but look how the thinking gets richer at each stage. Force yourself to keep asking “so what does this mean” or “why” pushing the analysis harder and harder.
Analytical Tools: SWOT, PEST, FORCE FIELD
A good analytical tool helps to separate out attributes on the brand that may contribute positively or negatively, are happening vs could happen.
A SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. I have found it used best for a new launch where strengths are untapped assets the brand can unleash and weaknesses are things that must be over come. Always force yourself with strengths and weaknesses to look at it through the lens of impacting revenue. So instead of “boring name”, you’d change that to “name unknown, and lacks inspiration to drive a price premium”. Always connect your analysis to the P&L.
PESTstands for Political, Environmental, Social and Technological and is best used when the brand is in a highly sensitive market or one that is filled with conflicts, controversies or at the leading edge of market trends. This can be added to either of the other two or stand on its own.
A Force Fieldanalysis is best served for those brands in a sustaining position where marketing plays the role of driving innovation and creativity within a box. Always keep in mind that Drivers and Inhibitors are happening now. You can see the impact in the current year. Anything in the future gets moved down to Opportunitiesand Threats which are not happening but could happen. Invariably, people mix this up and things that could happen move up when they really shouldn’t.
The best thing about the force field is you can easily take it into an action plan, because you want to keep the drivers goingand overcome the inhibitors Then take advantage of the opportunitiesand minimize or eliminate any serious threats. It’s a great simple management tool.
The Tools Help Frame Your Thinking but Never Replace it.
I hope this has helped you to learn something new. Please follow me on Twitter at@grayrobertson1
To read more on How to Analyze Your Brand, read the presentation below:
At Beloved Brands, we love to see Brand Leaders reach their full potential. Here are the most popular article “How to” articles. We can offer specific training programs dedicated to each topic. Click on any of these most read articles:
From my consumer-packaged-goods marketing days, I learned the discipline of asking the right questions, before moving to figure out the solution. Strategic Thinkers see “what if” questions before they see solutions. They first dive deep to make sure they understand what is truly happening. Then they map out a range of decision trees that intersect and connect by imagining how events will play out. They reflect and plan before they act. They are thinkers and planners who can see connections. So it fits that you should do the work to figure out the right questions on the business before figuring out the right answers.
The right questions are the Key Issues.
The 5 Steps to Doing a Key issues deck:
Start with ‘Straw Dog’ Vision Statement to help frame where you want to go.
Analysis: Top 3 Drivers, Inhibitors, Risk & Opportunities.
Summarize the Brand Health vs. Wealth, cutting it at both Internal and External.
Then using the ‘straw dog’ vision as a beacon and the analysis to explain what’s happening; Brainstorm all the things getting in the way of you achieving your vision. You might come up with a list of 10=20 issues. Group them, narrow them, sort them.
Vote to Narrow to the top 3-5 Key Issues.
Straw Dog Vision Statement
A straw dog vision is really a big huge goal. Put yourself in your shoes 5-10 years out, and ask yourself what would the 3 things you want to have achieved on that date? What would give you a sense of accomplishment? I use the ‘straw dog’ version more as a place holder at this point, and would keep re-fining the vision through the long-range strategic planning process. The role of the vision within the Key Issues process is to open yourself up beyond the current day-to-day muck and get you to think bigger. This allows the issues to become bigger and more strategic.
Force Field Analysis
There are a few possible options you can use, but for real live businesses, I prefer the Force FIeld analysis: What are the factors currently driving your business? What are the factors inhibiting your business? The drivers are about momentum that you are seeing on your business and you want to keep going. The inhibitors are the things holding you back and need to be reversed or knocked down. Always keep in mind, these two factors are happening now.
When you then layer in the Opportunities and Threats, these are not happening, but could happen. The opportunities could be things such as new markets you want to enter, new technologies or an untapped area you’re seeing. You want to raise these ideas and opportunities to management in an assertive selling way. Threats have to be real, not pie in the sky maybe’s. These could be competitors coming into the market, changes in regulations and changing customer behavior.
Actions coming out of the Force Field
For drivers, you want to Continue/Enhance: Stay focused on things going right, keep accelerating and driving them. Continuous improvement.
For inhibitors, you want to Minimize/Reverse. Close the leaks, develop turnaround plans or re-focus the team against the trend.
You want to Take Advantage of the Opportunities. Build plans to mobilize the brand to see if the opportunity is a winning space for the brand.
For the Threats, you want to Avoid or build Contingency plans. Identify and measure the risk, explore plans to avoid. Fill the gap before a competitor.
For new businesses that are yet in the market, I might switch it up so that Drivers become Strengths that speaks to the assets we’re bringing to the market and Inhibitors become Weaknesses that showcase potential gaps in the business. Another good analysis for a brand that is impacted severely by the environment is a PEST analysis where you look at the Political, Economic, Social and Technological.
Deep dive on each Driver and each Inhibitor
Narrow down your list of inhibitors and then a best-in-class deck would blow out the details around each driver and inhibitor with a page or two for each. Looking at the example below, of a one-page explanation behind an Inhibitor, you want 4 key attributes on the one pager:
List out the Driver/inhibitor
Use a key visual or chart that showcases the data and facts behind the driver/inhibitor.
Tell the fact-based story with 2-3 argument points.
In the box at the bottom, you should call out a potential action to address this driver and inhibitor.
Brand Health and Wealth
A great analysis I recommend is to do a Brand Health vs Brand Wealth. Think of the wealth as things you can see connected to things like sales, shares, margins or profits. For Health, it’s the things you can’t see, like trial, repeat, processes etc. just like a human, you can’t judge the health just by looking at someone. You need to dig deep and understand below the surface. Breaking it this way gives us four key boxes
External Health: Connecting with consumers is a source of power for brands. Understand the brand funnel and It’s impact on the results. How your consumer sees your brand, starting at awareness, trial, repeat all the way down the brand funnel to brand loyalty. Build on your strengths and attack your weaknesses
External Wealth:Healthy win in the marketplace. Beloved Brands can leverage success into power and drive wealth. Beloved Brands are more efficient, higher sales, lower costs, better margins, higher over all profits.
Internal Health: What is the internal beacon that helps all employees get it and live it. The idea of the brand has to be embedded right into the culture in a consistent manner. They have to realize their impact on the end customer.
Internal Wealth: Everyone focused on Profit and Value. Assets, IP, culture, contracts, ownership. Lining up and delivering the brand promise to a clear set of objectives, helps employees see that they are contributing to and sharing in the brand wealth. Everyone should understand where and how they impact profitability.
A great example of why breaking it out this way is crucial is Apple in Q4 of 2012. if we look at traditional measures, Apple had their highest sales ever, share increased across all products, margins reached an all-time high, and yet we have to look at the Brand Health to see the stock price came crumbling down. Apple’s innovation has slowed down, the intensity of feelings among the most loyal consumers has slipped due to challenges from Samsung and they seem to lack an internal alignment going forward. Clearly the wealth of Apple exceeds the health, so the stock price began to reflect.
Start by looking at the Vision and Analysis and ask: what are the things getting in our way of achieving that Vision? You might hold a brainstorm with your team and start with 20 things getting in the way. Narrow it down, by starting to group things, elevate up to the next level or two and challenge to find the over-arching issue that might be made up of a few visible issues. As a guideline, there should be 3-5 key issues per brand. The crucial part of key issues is getting to the right level. If you have less, you are likely not detailed or specific enough, and if you have more…you should try to elevate some up to see if you can capture the bigger picture. Play around with it, until it feels at the right level.
Since business has a history of using warfare examples, here are three ranges of key issues for what the U.S. government might have been looking at for the Iraq war:
Too Low: How do we get more helicopters into Iraq? This is too specific or too small. Think about it, if there are other ways to get to the same goal (e.g. you could get more tanks) then the issue is too small.
Too High: How do we drive Peace in the Middle East? This is aspiration, but unrealistic. If it feels too much to chew off, then it’s too big of an issue.
Just Right: What’s the most effective way to change Regimes in Iraq? This talks closer to the overall objective…but with enough room to give strategic alternatives
Following the Gray’s Cookie Case Study example, here are the three Key Issues.
The Power of Three’s:
When I do these workshops, I force my teams tio use three’s whether it’s the driver and inhibitors or more importantly the Key Issues. I like to see the teams focus more. Forcing it down to 3 only might push them to look at the over-arching issues by looking bigger causes and issues than they first look at.
But most importantly, we ask the Key Issues in question format because the answer to that question is the strategy. So, if you narrow it down to the biggest 3 issues that lines you up to having 3 big strategies. I also recommend 3 tactics per strategy. That means, the Brand will have 9 major projects to spread the financial and people resources. Even if you had 5 strategies and 5 tactics under each, you’d exponentially be up to 25 key projects. I would bet that the quality on the execution of the 9 would exceed the execution of the 25 on the other brand.
Asking the Big Questions Leads to Big Strategies and Big Results
Here’s a learning session on Key Issues with a full case study using Gray’s cookies.
Other Stories You Might Like
How to Write a Brand Positioning Statement. Before you even get into the creative brief, you should be looking at target, benefits and reason to believe. To read how to write a Brand Positioning Statement, click on this hyperlink: How to Write an Effective Brand Positioning Statement
How to Write a Brand Plan: The creative brief also requires you to be looking at the Advertising Strategy that comes out of the Brand Plan. The plan forces you to make choices on how you’re going to make the most of that promise. Follow this hyperlink to read more on writing a Brand Plan: How to Write a Brand Plan
How to Write a Creative Brief. The creative brief really comes out of two sources, the brand positioning statement and the advertising strategy that should come from the brand plan. To read how to write a Creative Brief, click on this hyperlink: How to Write a Creative Brief
Turning Brand Love into Power and Profits: The positioning statement sets up the promise that kick starts the connection between the brand and consumer. There are four other factors that connect: brand strategy, communication, innovation and experience. The connectivity is a source of power that can be leveraged into deeper profitability. To read more click on the hyper link: Love = Power = Profits
I run the Brand Leader Learning Center, with programs on a variety of topics that are all designed to make better Brand Leaders. To read more on how the Learning Center can help you as a Brand Leader click here: Brand Leadership Learning Center
Pick your Social Media vehicle and follow us by clicking on the icon below:
To reach out directly, email me at firstname.lastname@example.org
About Graham Robertson:The reason why I started Beloved Brands Inc. is to help brands realize their full potential value by generating more love for the brand. I only do two things: 1) Make Brands Better or 2) Make Brand Leaders Better. I have a reputation as someone who can find growth where others can’t, whether that’s on a turnaround, re-positioning, new launch or a sustaining high growth. And I love to make Brand Leaders better by sharing my knowledge. I’m a marketer at heart, who loves everything about brands. My background includes 20 years of CPG marketing at companies such as Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer Consumer, General Mills and Coke. My promise to you is that I will get your brand and your team in a better position for future growth. Add me on LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamrobertson1 so we can stay connected.