Share this with your network of MarketersShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this page

 

Within the last 48 hours, I’ve now heard that Microsoft has launched a tablet and will open their first store outside the US, right here in Toronto. To me, both are direct and desperate copies of Apple.  And both are mistakes that won’t really help the brand garner any consumer love, but rather keeping it stuck at the “Like It” stage.

“It’s a nice reader, but there’s nothing on the iPad I look at and say, ‘Oh, I wish Microsoft had done it.’  “

Bill Gates, 26 months ago.

To put all my potential biases on the table, I have an iPhone, iPad and a Mac desk top, but I also have a PC, both desktop and an ultra book. So,I’d say I’m fairly balanced between Apple and PC.   But there are two major differences in how I feel about each:

  1. My PC is functionally efficient. It’s smart, easy, just makes sense. When I get emails from people using a PC, there’s no risk of conversion difficulties. I prefer word to pages etc. But, while I like my PC, I absolutely LOVE my i-stuff and get excited every time I use them. I can’t wait for what’s next.
  2. In no way do I connect my PC to the Microsoft brand. My PC is a Toshiba.  Microsoft might think they are the PC, and tried to convince us with those “I’m a PC” ads, but that did nothing for me.  The only moment I thought about Microsoft was the 12 minutes it took me to load Office and the 23 seconds it took me to file away the box.

Brand success comes when you find what the consumer wants, and then match it up against something different that you do better than anyone else. What does this new tablet that is so different from what’s already in the market?  

For any brand, copying just makes you seem desperate, weak and uncertain of who you really are as a brand. Here are the three ways that Microsoft has tried to copy Apple.

Copycat Mistake #1:  Getting into the Tablet Business Feels like Zune

Getting into hardware is a big gamble and not something that fits with Microsoft’s strengths. To be a success, you either have to be better, different or cheaper and this feels like none of those. Just like the Zune, it feels as though they are late and aren’t really offering anything that’s a game-changer to the category. Like most categories at the stage where tablets are, until someone really shakes it up, the next few years are likely all about constant small innovation, new news each year with Apple leading the way on the high-end and Samsung’s cost innovation will likely squeeze Microsoft right out of the category. The analysts are so excited by the launch that the MSFT stock price is down 1.3%.

Copycat Mistake #2:  Microsoft Stores Don’t Have the Drawing Power

Microsoft is launching a new store in Toronto, which will be their 12th store.  Everything in the Microsoft stores feel like a direct copy of the Apple store format. Open concept and instead of a genius bar, they have technician helpers. But the products in stores aren’t all Microsoft, but rather other PC brands like Toshiba, Dell or HP. Doesn’t that really just make it another Best Buy? For these stores succeed, they’ll have to come up with something different or they just won’t have the drawing power to generate enough sales to justify the store.  About five times this year, I’ve walked past an Apple store just before it was about to open and it had a line of about 10-15 people already waiting to get in. Any time of the day, they draw a crowd. That’s brand power. On the other hand, Microsoft has had to resort to free concert tickets to generate a line up for opening day.

Copycat #3:  I’m a PC was an Advertising Disaster

Some of the best advertising of the last decade was “I’m a Mac…and I’m a PC”  capturing our imagination with hundreds of clever spots. At the early stages of that campaign, I was in a crowded bar with that constant hum of noise that a bar produces. All of a sudden the place went silent.  All the patrons looked up at the TV for 29 seconds of an “I’m a Mac” and we all laughed and then carried on, back to the constant hum of bar noise. That’s a powerful brand.  But Microsoft’s “I’m a PC” response was a disaster.  It felt desperate, contrived and just awkward.  Almost embarrassing.  These are just bad.

For all the power and the efforts over the last 30 years, Microsoft still feels like it’s stuck at the Liked stage, never achieving any real love. At their height, they had a positional power of the early 1990s with a dominant Windows presence. They destroyed every competitor in sight. Poor Word Perfect and Lotus 1-2-3. Even then, there was very little emotion between the brand and the consumer.  Instead, they exerted their monopolistic power, doing nothing for the consumer.

Beloved Brands would have died for what Microsoft had back in the 1990s. They would have begun to listen to what consumers wanted and started to build their brand around the life of the consumer, being at the forefront of what the consumer wanted, giving it to them before they even knew they wanted it.  They would have found ways over the years to surprise and delight their consumer base with true innovation, style and design.  They would have shifted their focus towards creating a brand image with perceived quality that tugs at the heart instead of just relying on real quality that feeds the mind.  They would have put all their focus on the entire experience of the consumer, not just standing behind their better mousetrap and the monopoly of Intellectual Property.  Wait a second, this is starting to sound a lot like Apple. If only Microsoft had copied the Apple strategy beneath the surface, instead of just trying to do the same tactics as Apple (a tablet, a store and a TV ad) then maybe they would have turned their positional power of the 1990s into a Beloved Brand.

For those who want to laugh, here’s the best of the “I’m a Mac” ads.

 

Beloved Brands: Who are we?

At Beloved Brands, we promise that we will make your brand stronger and your brand leaders smarter. We can help you come up with your brand’s Brand Positioning, Big Idea and Brand Concept. We also can help create Brand Plans that everyone in your organization can follow and helps to focus your Marketing Execution. We provide a new way to look at Brand Management, that uses a provocative approach to align your brand to the sound fundamentals of brand management. 

We will make your team of Brand Leaders smarter so they can produce exceptional work that drives stronger brand results. We offer brand training on every subject in marketing, related to strategic thinking, analytics, brand planning, positioning, creative briefs, customer marketing and marketing execution. 

To contact us, email us at graham@beloved-brands.com or call us at 416-885-3911. You can also find us on Twitter @belovedbrands

Share this with your network of MarketersShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this page

Graham Robertson

Graham spent 20 years in Brand Management leading some of the world’s most beloved brands at Johnson and Johnson, General Mills and Coke, rising up to VP Marketing. In his career, he has won numerous Advertising, Innovation and Leadership awards. Graham played a major role in helping J&J win Marketing Magazine’s prestigious “Marketer of the Year” award.

Graham brings a reputation for challenging brand leaders to think differently and to be more strategically focused. Graham founded Beloved Brands in 2010, to help brands find growth and make brand leaders smarter. He leads workshops to help define your Brand Positioning, build your brand’s Big Idea, and write strategic Brand Plans that motivate and focus everyone that works on the brand. Our Beloved Brands training programs will help your team, produce exceptionally smart work work that drives stronger brand growth and profits. We cover everything a brand leader needs to know including strategic thinking, planning, positioning, execution and analytics.

Our robust client roster has included the NFL Players Association, Reebok, the NBA, Acura, Shell, Miller Lite, 3M, Jack Link’s and Pfizer. His weekly brand stories have generated over 5 million views.

4 Comments

Ron Strauss · June 21, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Physics teaches us that two bodies cannot occupy the same space at the same time.
Apple already occupies the counter-culture, cool space, and exhibits high degrees of customers being loyal to the brand. Apple is known for its ‘cool’ design and ease of use. Apple is fundamentally a consumer company and gets rewarded by investors with a relatively high muliple/market valuation.
MS would be smart to avoid trying to directly emulate Apple’s formula (thus competing with Apple on Apple’s terms), and, instead, try to create its own space by emphasizing its business/enterprise level advantages and how, for example, its software/database technology can turn social media into measureable competitive advantage.

    beloved brands · June 21, 2012 at 2:59 pm

    Ron, couldn’t agree more. I could have written this same story for RIM, who also has tried to be cool and counter cultural. I kept thinking the whole time….this feels like RIM all over again. And I’m going to steal your physics line!!! I have to, it’s just that good.

michaelmiller68 · June 23, 2012 at 11:25 am

I am no Microsoft fan (I’m an Apple snob, as my wife calls me), but u think your criticism is a little too harsh.

Their business strategy worked perfectly for 15 years or more. They dominated the market they wanted to own. Their downfall was getting too big and looking at ways to tweak their wins rather than look for entirely new markets. They are hardly alone in that sense. The majority of Fortune 500 companies are on that list for only a limited time.

Apple has now hit the critical mass where they will start to make some of those same mistakes. Indeed, there are already signs in the market that this is happening. It makes me sad, but it’s true.

Apple has created entirely new markets in it’s industry. Big markets. Microsoft has two options: ignore the revenue potential or try to get a piece of it. What would you do? Zune, you are right, was a disaster. Their only flaw their, though, was not realizing it sooner and killing the project and trying something new. Try, fail, try again. They have gotten too big to remember that lesson. Maybe they can get it back, but it won’t likely happen with their current leadership.

Last thought: I disagree that the I’m a PC ads were a waste of money. They didn’t resonate with me. I’m a Mac. But they did hit with a core audience: those people who are PCs and were tired of being mocked. They provided the rational they needed to justify their decision to be Mac haters. They fed their community. It was also a little ego on Balmer’s part I’m sure.

Enjoyed the post, thanks for sharing your views.

The Microsoft Tablet Disaster was so easy to Predict « Beloved Brands · July 31, 2013 at 6:21 pm

[…] Why Does Microsoft Keep Copying Apple? […]

Comments: have your say

Related Posts

Beloved Brands in the Market

The new John Lewis 2017 Christmas advertising fails to deliver on the high expectations of consumers

Share this with your network of Marketers The new John Lewis 2017 Christmas advertising is out.  I feel like a little kid who races downstairs only to be disappointed by my gift. And then I Read more…

Beloved Brands in the Market

How can a junk business be the best consumer experience of any brand I’ve ever seen

Share this with your network of MarketersHaving been in our current house for 16 years, as our kids have gone from 4 up to 20 years old, we have naturally accumulated a lot of junk. Read more…

Beloved Brands in the Market

McDonald’s service hits rock bottom in drive thru ratings

Share this with your network of MarketersMcDonald’s was founded on the basis of customer service. Ray Kroc, the original McDonald’s CEO put huge emphasis on a customer first mentality: “McDonald’s is a people business, and that Read more…